home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Alex deVries writes:
- > On Sat, 4 Jul 1998, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
- > > To me, the fact that it is cheap, draws less than 20 amps and is quiet is
- > > the main attraction. I might be able to buy a laptop that is about the
- > The fact that the Netwinder draws less than 20 amps isn't an attraction at
- > all. My refridgerator uses less. What's more significant is that it uses
- > less than 20 milliamps.
-
- When you compare this with a PC (at work, we've had to measure the power
- consumption of our PCs in a system we manufacturer to size a custom UPS)
- of spec:
-
- 16MB RAM, 486DX4 100MHz, *No* hard disk, Flash/SRAM solid state card,
- 16 RS422 serial ports running at 38400 baud (and 10 in use), Video card
- (Trident), Arcom PCSYSCON card. No monitor connected.
-
- which took over 4Amps 60 degrees out of phase with the power supply (I
- think that the phase figure is correct), then this works out at around
- 480W in phase with the supply (yes, that's just an estimation). The
- powersupply got hot as well, and you could feel a nice breeze of warm
- air blowing out the back. (Oh, and I can quote quite a lot of horror
- stories about fan failures on our normal PCs as well).
-
- Although I don't have any figures for my ARM based machines here, I can
- definitely say that they use a lot less power. The only way that I can
- say this is for the following fact:
-
- 1) EBSA-285 (with 3com 3c592 and S3 Trio64 added): the PSU has a
- temperature controlled PSU, and the fan is always running slowly.
-
- 2) EBSA-110: When the original PSU fan started being noisy (I hate noisy
- fans), I got a replacement from DEC, which at first reconnected to
- the +12V line in the PSU. However, I thought why should I when
- the EBSA-110 takes no more than about 7W? Now, it's connected to
- the +5V line and the PSU is still cool. PLUS, DEC had to put a
- resistor on the PSU +12V line to keep the PSU in spec *because*
- the EBSA-110 takes so little power.
-
- I haven't got the Netwinder figures here, but I bet that it's at least
- an order of magnitude below a PC.
-
- Hence, the argument should no longer be one of:
-
- 'A PC costs to buy 900ukp, but a RiscPC costs 1500ukp'
-
- but more of:
-
- 'A PC costs xxx ukp to run each week, but a RiscPC costs yy ukp'.
-
- Then you start to see where the real cost savings are with ARM technology.
- Incidentally, the other advantage is that because it's not drawing a
- lot of power, it's not getting hot, therefore:
- - electronic components are more reliable.
- - less need for mechanical fans which:
- - clog up with dust.
- - fail due to bearing wear.
- - clog up your floppy drive with dust.
- - when they fail normally take out the processor as well.
-
- If someone wishes to dispute this, then I'll happily collect all the
- figures together to prove it when I'm next at work.
- _____
- |_____| ------------------------------------------------- ---+---+-
- | | Russell King linux@arm.uk.linux.org --- ---
- | | | | http://www.arm.uk.linux.org/~rmk/armlinux.html / / |
- | +-+-+ --- -+-
- / | THE developer of ARM Linux |+| /|\
- / | | | --- |
- +-+-+ ------------------------------------------------- /\\\ |
-
- Buy a mobile for 1ukp and pay 100ukp per month line rental, or
- buy a mobile for 100ukp and pay 1ukp per month line rental. Which
- would you prefer? I know which one I'd like.
- unsubscribe: body of `unsubscribe linux-arm' to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
-
-